The upload option is not working, so please click the link below to view the video:
http://youtu.be/orU1PeY7Da4
Perceiving is the use of all of
your sensing to create or interpret something fully. My original observation of
mentoring programs for Chinese international programs typically perceived them
from a visual lens. Looking at programs through only a single lens, in this
case visual, created a flawed understanding of the program. When perceiving a
mentor program visually, the question of “what does is look like?” is
prioritized. The answer to this question often includes words, which by
definition, involve some sort of power dynamic. For example, the statement “In
the mentoring program, I see a domestic student assisting a Chinese
international student.” In this example, the domestic student is the one with
the power who capable of “assisting” the Chinese student. Assisting could also
be replaced with words such as: informing, aiding, helping, and advising. This
view dismisses the skills, knowledge, and abilities of international students
and creates a flawed understanding of the true nature and purpose of mentoring
programs. The perception of mentoring programs based in a visual lens puts
value of domestic students over international students, even though the
original intention of mentoring programs is to support international students.
One must recognize that domestic students are not the only ones who have the
skills and knowledge to help others. The true value of a successful mentoring
program is an exchange of knowledge.
In order to view mentoring programs
as an exchange, one must re-imagine what a mentoring program should look like
and how to assess its success. Originally, success was measured by what
programs looked like. However, these views lead to a power dynamic that
ultimately valued domestic students over international students. We can combat
this valued system by expanding our perception of mentoring programs to include
questions of feelings, rather than limiting them to previous visual
perceptions. By asking “how do you feel?” we are able to see and hear a shared
value of knowledge. Domestic students are no longer viewed as the bearers of
knowledge; rather both students begin to engage in dialogues and opportunities
that promote an exchange of knowledge and skills. Statements are then made that
speak to the shared experience, for example, “In the mentoring program I feel
valued.” It does not matter whether this statement was made by the domestic
student or the international students; the value is that it demonstrates a
feeling of cooperation and even exchange.
This new understanding of mentoring
programs for Chinese international students provides a reminder to keep in mind
the purpose the program. The purpose of mentoring programs is to support and
develop international students. However, opportunities exist to not only
support and develop international students, but also domestic students. By
understanding the goals and opportunities one can ensure mentor programs are
successful and beneficial for all students.
No comments:
Post a Comment